Just Pink Enough

#ffebee

A neutral that has no useful hue — it reads as a grey. It is very light — it works as a page background, not as text.

Hex

#ffebee

RGB

255, 235, 238

OKLCh

95.7% 0.022 7.2°

CIELAB (D50)

94.7, 7.4, 1.1

What is true of this colour, and of no other

  • 15 other named colours sit within ΔE00 2 of it — this part of the space is crowded, and the names here are finer distinctions than most people make.
  • It sits exactly on the sRGB boundary: at this lightness and hue the gamut has nothing left, and a wider display would show a more colourful version of it.
  • As text on white it measures APCA Lc 0.0; on black, Lc -97.8. The sign is the polarity, which the WCAG ratio discards.
  • Built into an eleven-step scale, 10 of the 10 adjacent pairs stay ΔE00 2 apart — see the ramp.
  • protanopia and deuteranopia and tritanopia shift it by ΔE00 8.8 and 9.9 and 28.0 — no red cone.

Text on this colour

White text

1.14:1 — fails AA

Black text

18.37:1 — passes AA

Black text is the better of the two at18.37:1. That is enough for body text.

As text on white, it needs to change

#847275 is the nearest colour of the same hue that passes AA on white, at 4.50:1. Only the lightness moved.

Try it against your own background

The same colour, with one cone missing

As you see it

#ffebee

protanopia

#ededee · ΔE00 8.8

deuteranopia

#f1f1ee · ΔE00 9.9

tritanopia

#f5f59f · ΔE00 28.0

Run a whole palette through all three

The twelve nearest named colours

Ranked by CIEDE2000 — perceptual distance, not hex arithmetic. The closest isPink Sparkle at ΔE00 0.896: below 1.0 — an ordinary observer cannot tell these apart, even side by side. What the numbers mean.

7 of these have no page of their own: pages exist for the 4,961 colours the dataset marks as good names.